Open Unionism


A forum to discuss new ideas and perspectives on Unionism…

Union 2021: ‘Province must aim to be a beacon’

Another blogger associated with Open Unionism has contributed to the News Letter’s Union 2021 series of articles. This latest article by Lee Reynolds appeared in the News Letter on August 24

‘Province must aim to be a beacon’

Northern Ireland should not merely crawl across the centenary line in 2021…

By Lee Reynolds

1) What do you think Northern Ireland’s Union with Great Britain will look like in 2021?

It will look like whatever unionism puts its mind to and spends the next decade working for. It would be complacent to expect a better future to fall into unionism’s lap regardless of how good the economics or other factors look. If unionism is lazy it could be surprised how dissatisfactory a Northern Ireland of 2021 could look.

2) What would you like it to look like?

Rather than engage in fantasy politics with 2021 it should be approached as a chance for strategic politics. Unionism should set itself a series of targets for 2021. This would mean unionism and Northern Ireland not crawling across the centenary line but bounding over it into its second century.

A target should be Northern Ireland taking its place on the national stage as a full and constituent part of the United Kingdom, re-integrating us into national politics.

This will not be achieved through shallow deals with a consistently unreliable Conservative Party. Instead it will be achieved by making Northern Ireland a success. Through the full utilisation of devolution Ulster should seek to become a beacon within the Union. Many of our policy challenges are common throughout the UK and if you wish the national media and political class to build a meaningful relationship with you then tackling them is the means to do so. We need to be the tailor of new policy not wearing hand-me downs.

Electorally we need to grow, 50 per cent plus one may be all that unionism needs but it shouldn’t be satisfied with it. Unionism should aim for a vote share of 57 per cent by 2021 and a total non-nationalist share of 65 per cent. Unionism should seek to grow its vote among three groups:

  • Protestant Working Class Voters – This is the section of past unionist voters that have seen the greatest decline in turnout, not the middle classes as often claimed.
  • Minority Ethnic Voters – This is the social group that has seen the largest growth in Northern Ireland in the past decade. With many entirely new to Northern Ireland they have no allegiance to any party.
  • Catholic Voters – This will be a generational task and unionism needs to be realistic. A full ideological jump from nationalism to unionism in a society like ours is a significant step. Therefore, unionism’s task is a series of steps. Someone who previously voted for a nationalist party becoming a non-voter or voting for a non-nationalist party is an advance for unionism. After these a further step towards unionism becomes a greater possibility. The increasing identification with Northern Ireland by one in four Catholics also means a regional emphasis would be of value to unionism (and not a closet Ulster nationalism).

3) Is unionist unity essential for the achievement of your vision?

If unionist unity is done properly then it would help.

4) If so, what does that mean?

It means having a proper debate about what unionist unity could be rather than someone presenting a finished plan.

The discussion so far has told you more about the recriminations within the UUP than the risks and benefits of unity. The question should be what would a broad based unionist party fit for the 21st century look like? The answer to that will help people genuinely assess its value and if people’s concerns can be adequately addressed. A decent debate, rather than the presently stunted one, could ensure at least productive cooperation and collaboration as an outcome.

5) Could you accept a Sinn Fein first minister?

The risk of this has become over-stated with a DUP first minister the more likely result. Unionism need not face this possibility nor should it. Planning for failure is not conducive to a good vision or strategy but gets you mired in reactive counter-strategy.


Filed under: Union 2021, unionist unity?,

Leave a Reply

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in: Logo

You are commenting using your account. Log Out /  Change )

Google+ photo

You are commenting using your Google+ account. Log Out /  Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out /  Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out /  Change )

Connecting to %s

Enter your email address to subscribe to this blog and receive notifications of new posts by email.

Join 36 other followers

Open Unionism bookmarks

Our facebook group page

Party histories

Here's the history of the UUP.

Here's the history of the DUP.

Slideshow app for UUP & DUP flickrstreams

Follow this link for a great slideshow from the UUP flickrstream.

Follow this link for a great slideshow from the DUP flickrstream.

UK Parliament on flickr

%d bloggers like this: