Open Unionism

Icon

A forum to discuss new ideas and perspectives on Unionism…

Union 2021: ‘Unity could help deliver a positive vision for unionism’

DUP MLA Arlene Foster has contributed to The News Letter’s Union 2021 series of articles. This latest article appeared in the News Letter on September 11

A positive unionism open to all would demonstrate the narrowness and restrictiveness of Irish nationalism…

WHEN I began my political involvement in unionism there was a debate raging within it.

The debate was characterised by the term ‘New Unionism’. What we have seen since then has been the outworking of that debate.

For someone who was deeply involved in the discussions around ‘New Unionism’ it became apparent to me there was a division within those who used the term.

Some simply wished to find a term to hide their intellectual poverty and desire to cut a deal at any costs with nationalism. Others wanted it to mean a Unionism better at all that it did including negotiations.

I was never among the former group, the defeatists but I always wanted a better, more strategic, confident and professional unionism.
With the Belfast Agreement the defeatists got their way. With such poor foundations the results were predictable – political instability and never ending concessions that were debilitating to unionism.

When the DUP took the lead in negotiations, you saw what those committed to a better Unionism could do. Unionists went to the negotiating table and came away with something better than what they started with.

The result has been stable devolved government that was able to square the policing and justice circle. Although, I accept that the form of devolution that we now have is not perfect and further changes need to be made in order to make it a better form of government.

What does this background have to do with 2021?

Because it is was this debate in 1990’s unionism that has shaped the Northern Ireland we live in today.

The poverty of vision of the defeatists was implemented and exposed. The mantle of delivering a better unionism and Northern Ireland had fallen to the DUP.

The DUP’s 2003 Assembly campaign of “It’s time for a fair deal” made clear they wanted to lift that mantle. The UUP refused to learn anything from its defeat and chose to carry on regardless with its weak-kneed approach.

That is why after the 2003 election I, like tens of thousands of former Ulster Unionist voters, moved to the DUP. Yet the tasks of this better unionism did not end with an agreement that delivered political stability.

Our task for 2021 and beyond is to build a new shining city on the hill. A city built on the values of excellence, enterprise, family, limited government and tolerance.

A gateway into this city will be the Ulster Protestant identity but it will not be the only one.

The mistake civic/liberal unionists make is that they believe they can build a new city upon exclusion of those who come to Unionism on the basis of identity. They are wrong.

They wrongly present people’s political choices as one dimensional. Unionism will be its most successful when all its gateways are open and it has a message that aims to attract the greatest number to the cause of the greater good.

Unionism can have a breadth and depth to it that can make it relevant to more people than the narrowness and restrictiveness of Irish nationalism.

Unionist unity could help deliver such a vision. The idea of the new city is an inclusive one. It is an idea that a credible and sustainable broad church could be built around.

It can create space for Unionism to adopt new approaches. The human and financial resources of Unionism can be focused on delivering a positive vision for Unionism and Northern Ireland rather than back-biting and sniping.

Some have jumped on the Fermanagh and South Tyrone result as an electoral argument against unionist unity.

However, they omit that their predictions of an energised nationalism were incorrect (the nationalist vote fell).

They also wilfully ignore that a divided unionism delivered a 10 per cent drop in the unionist vote.

However, beyond the statistics they fail to grasp how strong and powerful an idea unionist unity could be built around.

Arlene Foster is a DUP MLA for Fermanagh and South Tyrone and the minister for enterprise, trade and investment

Advertisements

Filed under: Union 2021, unionist unity?, ,

4 Responses

  1. Dilettante says:

    The only thing that unites all unionists is the Union itself. The union is more secure now than it has been in a long time, so a broad church ‘unity’ platform built around the principle of unionism is unnecessary.

    It is worth asking though – what do you mean by ‘unity’? One party? Some kind of non-compete or electoral coalition? All of these options deny the electorate a choice between different visions of unionism, and stifle internal debate within unionism itself. Additionally, no unity coalition built around the DUP is likely to attract Catholic voters, which is something unionism should be trying very hard to do.

    I don’t think it’s a coincidence that those keenest on ‘unity’ are the DUP and DUP-inclined members of the UUP. Given that the DUP are currently the largest party, what would the difference be between ‘Unionist Unity’ and ‘DUP Hegemony’?

  2. Scamallach says:

    I only read the title – does she mean Irish unity?

  3. Scamallach says:

    Just rakin.

    I have to say I (at least partly) agree with Dilettante above. It should be pretty clear to any current UUP voter/party member that the DUP are suggesting unity now because they are in a position of relative strength. They are taking advantage of the UUP’s weakness to make a move which would, at least in the medium term, eliminate their closest rival.

    Unionist unity might in a purely technical sense consolidate the vote, but in actual fact it would lead to a drop in unionist voters. Why would voters be encouraged to turn out if they had no real choice to make? Many would stay at home, seeing their vote as inconsequential. The only possible beneficiaries from this would be the DUP, directly, and Alliance, indirectly.

    It is also true that the DUP are unattractive to Catholics. What self-respecting Catholic would vote for a party whose long-time former leader raves at every available opportunity that the Pope is the antichrist?? People such as Gregory Campbell and Willie McCrea perpetuate Big Ian’s Protestant extremism – I would be amazed if a single Catholic had ever voted for these cretins.

  4. The mistake civic/liberal unionists make is that they believe they can build a new city upon exclusion of those who come to Unionism on the basis of identity. They are wrong.

    I’ve never heard any liberal unionist say anything of the sort. This is a shocking straw man argument.

Leave a Reply

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in:

WordPress.com Logo

You are commenting using your WordPress.com account. Log Out / Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out / Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out / Change )

Google+ photo

You are commenting using your Google+ account. Log Out / Change )

Connecting to %s

Enter your email address to subscribe to this blog and receive notifications of new posts by email.

Join 24 other followers

Open Unionism On Twitter

Error: Twitter did not respond. Please wait a few minutes and refresh this page.

Open Unionism bookmarks

Our facebook group page

Party histories

Here's the history of the UUP.

Here's the history of the DUP.

Slideshow app for UUP & DUP flickrstreams

Follow this link for a great slideshow from the UUP flickrstream.

Follow this link for a great slideshow from the DUP flickrstream.

UK Parliament on flickr

President of Colombia with former First Minister of Northern Ireland

Lord Speaker statement of thanks

Wide shot of audience

President Santos giving address

Mr Speaker welcome speech

More Photos
%d bloggers like this: